The News & Observer is reporting today that contracts for new signage for Raleigh’s Beltline will go out in November. Part of the deal involves new nomenclature for the confusing I-440 and I-40 sections known as “The Beltline”.
Back in 2002 DOT engineers recommended a new system for labeling parts of the road. What DOT will do is remove “I-440″ from the southern portion of the Beltline (the section that is I-40), and label the remaining I-440 as an East/West road. If one thinks of the Beltline as being shaped like a bell, the curvaceous upper portion will be I-440 while the bottom rim is I-40.
The two sides of I-440 will be labeled by the direction on the bell that they are eventually traveling. The West point is toward Cary, near Crossroads shopping center (map it) and the East point is that where I-40 breaks off toward Wilmington, near Walnut Creek Amphitheater (map it).
I’ve traveled to many cities with loop freeways and I’ve never seen one struggle with its nomenclature as much as we do. Ultimately the new nomenclature makes sense because the Beltline is not a closed loop. In order for the new system to work, however, the name “Beltline” should be dropped as it implies a closed loop. A new name should include the implication of an arc, such as the “Midtown Arc” or “Sir Walter Crescent”. We all know that citizens will not drop the Beltline name, however, and confusion will ensue.
New naming systems take time for adoption, and the introduction of DVD-based navigation systems won’t improve this lag time. While the state is as it, they ought to make an enormous leap in clarification by dropping the “440″ label all together, and going with another hundreds digit, like “340″, but that’s the subject of another post. Hopefully the use of West and East will make at least some improvement to the confusion.