Comments on: Hampton Inn Proposed for Glenwood South

By: Chris

Chris — Wed, 29 Dec 2010 17:25:17 +0000

Newest update with renderings as of 11/12/10:

Please note this is a pdf file…enjoy.

http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.raleighnc.gov/content/PlanCurrent/Documents/DevelopmentPlansReview/PlansInReview/2010/PlansSubmittalMapsByType/SitePlan/SP-056-10.pdf&sa=U&ei=cG0bTZP5OcP6lweSqqnvCw&ved=0CBYQFjAB&sig2=I0d3ZCk_d5-JMxhF7T5VGg&usg=AFQjCNEpiFCiVDkC4tV1cKRK0gVTY2at-Q

By: Dana

Dana — Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:47:18 +0000

The City is asking a judge to overturn the Board of Adjustment’s variance, citing that the board had overstepped its legal function in granting the variance.
http://www.newsobserver.com/news/story/1653002.html

By: Dana

Dana — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:56:16 +0000

That looks great! I also found photos at these links:
http://www.hamptoninn.com/en/hp/hotels/index.jhtml?moreDesc=true&ctyhocn=CMHHSHX
http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=columbus+oh+hampton+inn+high+street&FORM=BIFD

By: John

John — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:49:54 +0000

http://media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/media/photo-s/01/22/36/40/hampton-inn-downtown.jpg

Here’s another H.I Columbus link.

By: John

John — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:47:11 +0000

Here’s a photo of a brick 7 story Hampton Inn in Columbus, OH. http://maps.google.com/maps?near=Columbus,+OH&geocode=&q=hampton+inn&f=l&sll=39.962208,-83.000676&sspn=0.399981,0.539703&ie=UTF8&ll=39.972303,-83.002755&spn=0,359.198685&t=h&z=11&iwloc=A&layer=c&cbll=39.971876,-83.002519&panoid=pppoGRZ0oCw2Hed9GM2urg&cbp=12,334.46,,0,1.5
Let’s hope that ours is as neighborhood appropriate as this one.

By: Dana

Dana — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:00:05 +0000

Thanks for clarifying, Ken!

By: Ken

Ken — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:24:34 +0000

I’ve seen the Board of Adjustment minutes, and figured that was the origin of the statement. The testimony that “the proposed revised Comprehensive Plan will have no building height restrictions for this property” is technically true but irrelevant, as heights are not regulated by the Comprehensive Plan, but rather by zoning. By this argument, unlimited height would be permitted everywhere in Raleigh. The Plan does not specifically recommend changing permitted heights in this area.

By: Eric

Eric — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:13:31 +0000

Couldn’t agree more Subway Scoundrel. I am a diamond member and the urban ones are very similar to the roadside ones but do seem to be cleaner.

As a business traveler, I like to be close to a cities core. Not having options for hotels in downtown Raleigh is insane and will continue to hinder downtown until we are provided with more lodging.

By: Subway Scoundrel

Subway Scoundrel — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:18:50 +0000

Agree with the need of a Hampton Inn. As a Silver VIP Hilton Points member, and working my way even higher, I stay in a lot of urban Hilton properties and many Hamptons are pretty nice and moderately priced. Good for business on GWsouth.

I find the urban Hamptons are kept up much better than the roadside versions. Could use 2 or 3 more hotels down there.

By: Dana

Dana — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:00:22 +0000

Thanks for the info, Ken. The point I was making came from this passage of the meeting minutes:

“Attorney Isabel Worthy Mattox (sworn) indicated she is representing Glenwood South Hospitality LLC and noted her clients have developed and owned hotels in North Carolina, South Carolina and Florida. She introduced members of a development team and reviewed the history of the ownership of the property. She stated the case is complicated by the current zoning. She stated her client proposes to build a Hampton Inn & Suites without the required step backs. She submitted an abridged version of the Glenwood South streetscape plan which was included in the Board members adjacent packet and stated the proposed revised Comprehensive Plan will have no building height restrctions for this property. She described the current zoning regulations noting the proposed hotel would be 7 stories with approximately 71 feet in height along Glenwood Avenue and 79 feet in height on Johnson Street. She pointed out the adjacent 510 Glenwood Avenue building was built prior to the adoption of the Glenwood South Plan.”

By: Ernest

Ernest — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:53:17 +0000

Thanks for the photo, John. I do agree with you, the Glenwood South Hampton Inn needs to be a bit more interesting. The two taller neighbors (510 and Glenwood Towers) contain a lot of brick but the proposed hotel could use at least some, too. God forbid it is a copy of our [convention] Marriott Hotel :LOL:

By: Ken

Ken — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:52:58 +0000

Just a quick correction. The statement that the “comprehensive plan the City of Raleigh is about to accept would also relax restrictions such as the 1|1 setback in this area” is false. Such action requires a separate rezoning, including an amendment to the Glenwood South streetscape plan.

By: John

John — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:23:10 +0000

Here’s a photo link to the Hampton Inn in Charlotte. It’s blah but not completely horrible. It’s pretty much flat across its front facade with a few floors of brick and the rest appears to be sythentic stucco. I sure hope the GloSo version is a bit more interesting.
https://image.pegs.com/images/HX/CLTUT/cltut_b1.jpg

By: Dana

Dana — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 14:43:30 +0000

I have to say that my room at the Hampton Inn in downtown Charlotte was nicer than my room at the Westin next to Lenox in Atlanta (which was a nice room). The only exception was Hampton’s lack of a bellman, which doesn’t bother me, and their crappy towels, which does bother me. All in all, though, it was a great experience.

By: steelcity36

steelcity36 — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 14:25:03 +0000

I agree that a Hampton Inn is perfect for GloSo. Hampton Inns have great urban locations at a reasonable rates. I estimate that many convention travelers will choose the Hampton at $80-$90 per night as compared to $159-$179 rate at the Marriott and Sheraton next to the convention center. Also weekend crowds will generally be made up of 20-30 year old people in town visiting friends or attending weddings so this is a perfect location. For those looking for a little South Beach in Raleigh with $300 night rates, maybe Niles from Solas could work on that concept and convert the Senior Citizen Dorm at Tucker and Glenwood into an Ian Schrager type hotel.

The Philadelphia Hampton Inn also has the same parking agreement. They utilize an adjacent parking Garage and valet all the cars there instead of building parking and adding to the cost of the building. Seems to work fine and I am sure that Lawyers will include strict contractual penalties for breaking such an agreement.

By: Eric

Eric — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 14:16:47 +0000

I travel alot and I mean alot and the only hotel I stay with usually is Hampton Inn because of a corporate rate discount. I have many co-workers that travel into Raleigh and I would love for them to stay downtown but there are not Hilton Brand hotels anywhere downtown which is obsurd for a city of this size and being a state capital.

For those that think Hampton Inn won’t fit in this area, you must be kidding right? NYC, Chicago, Boston, Savannah, etc. all have very, very nice Hampton Inn’s. Downtown needs options for hotels and especially something close to Glenwood South.

By: DPK

DPK — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 13:08:35 +0000

I’m not holding my breath until I see a foundation being built for anything. That and even if they do release a rendering, it had better not be another one of those 222-ish watercolor misleading pos drawings. Watercolor for the most part can make even the most hideous project appealing. * cough * 222 * cough *

By: John

John — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 13:05:19 +0000

I think the difference between this location and The Hue is the scale of the adjacent structures. This block of Glenwood, between Peace and Johnson, is entirely made up of small buildngs: some charming…some not so charming. I would really hate to see them get overwhelmed by an inappropriately scaled hotel. I am not against the idea of this hotel. I just want it to be sensitive to the context of their suroundings.

By: Ernest

Ernest — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:45:44 +0000

The original version of 222 Glenwood called for a similar concept: The 4 first floors were used for retail/commercial space and parking (deck) and there were 8 floors for the residences. There was a setback, of course. In a way, I wish that was the adopted form, but I am not sure the proposed hotel will have any negative effect without setbacks. Just look at the 100′ Hue; very underwhelming. The proposed Hampton Inn will be even more so, and it will be shorter than 222 Glenwood.

I do like the idea of a second floor restaurant and I think there is room for something like that. Maybe the developer will be encouraged to put a small setback but also be allowed to add a couple of floors to the final height to make up for lost space. More important for me is the architecture. I am really anxious to see renderings.

By: John

John — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 04:03:47 +0000

As a neighbor to the project, I completely object to the total elimination of the 1/1 stepback. Perhaps there’s room for negotiation here? I would just like to avoid seeing 7 floors on such a narrow lot go vertical with a flat front like the ungodly ugly 222 Glenwood.
The scale of the existing buildings on that block would be completely overwhelmed by having no step back whatsoever. If the new hotel was at least stepped back like it is with Solas, then the architecture could easily have more interest to it. It would also give the building an opportunity to have some outdoor space on the second or third floor facing the street.
I am VERY happy to hear that the hotel group will not pursue thru-wall HVAC units for each room. This will give the property a better look than a typical hotel. For that, I am happy. Let’s just hope that the building enhances the neighborhood instead of cheapening it. I hope it’s more “Solas” and less “222″.

By: boylanhghts

boylanhghts — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:47:53 +0000

how many days/weeks before this one goes away? its amazing how many hotels have been proposed for the area. the thing is, the first one that makes it off the drawing board is sure to do pretty well

By: Ernest

Ernest — Sun, 26 Jul 2009 04:14:14 +0000

I agree with Justin… A Hampton Inn is fine in Glenwood South, particularly when we take in consideration that there is plenty of land there that may be reused for other hospitality projects. As long as the design and urban form blend well and the final product doesn’t look like an eyesore, or out of place, this may encourage more such projects in that section of downtown.

By: Justin

Justin — Sat, 25 Jul 2009 21:37:03 +0000

Thanks for the extra details – some people have been mentioning they don’t think a Hampton Inn would be good for the area…I disagree. Not only do we desperately need more rooms downtown, but Hampton Inn has been known to have some pretty good urban locations – Savannah comes to mind first. Even though I believe that was a historic renovation and not a ground up build, it still looks nice and fits in with the urban fabric. Lets hope this one does too…and lets hope more projects like this start popping up, we really need more hotel rooms downtown!