I like the logical setup of grouping the channels into genres, but that also presents one negative. In the current setup, I know that my subscription plan pretty much goes from channel 2 to channel 135. I don’t have access to ESPNU or FSC or NHL or HBO etc, but all of those are above my browsing range.
With the new grouped scheme, will all of those channels that I don’t subscribe to just appear in the middle of my guide? “Ooh! That show looks good! Oh wait, I don’t get channel 260. I get channel 259 and 263, but not 260 or 261. Crap.”
Will TWC be smart enough to remove or at least gray-out the titles on the channels I don’t pay for?

No, they will not start greying out unsubscribed data in the guide. Currently the guide data shows all data for all channels (of COURSE they want you to know what you are missing!), and I don’t see that changing.

I use Windows Media Center with CableCARD and one of the great features is the ability to customize the guide. I can remove unsubscribed channels from the guide, which means that those programs won’t show up in search results, too. You can also renumber any channel you want, so if one wants to do away with Charlotte’s 1000s tier, they can just remap the HD channels to the number where the SD channel is.

After moving to Charlotte and getting a Time Warner box, I have found one thing that really annoys me that hasn’t yet made it to the Raleigh area. On TWC in Raleigh I could set it so that all of my favorite channels appeared grouped together at the start of the guide. I never even had to see the other channels. That option is gone now here. All you can do is hit the favorites button to slowly skip to your favorites. Frustrating.

(first world problems…)

On one hand I’m not looking forward to having to re-learn my favorite channels if this comes to Raleigh. But on the other hand, the logical numbering would be refreshing compared to the mostly-random way it is now. And the idea of simply adding a 1 before the number to get the HD version is really spiffy, when you think about it.

Spiffy is the word! We’re really tired of searching for the schedule, or sloooowly scrolling through the channels. I’m looking forward to this change.

This numbering system is similar to what U-Verse has been using the last couple years. Really handy when jumping around from HD to non-HD to get at the obscure or low-tier channel versions that aren’t yet available in HD yet (or if you are non-HD elsewhere in the house).

Jonathan,
The sort by favorites option was removed on all Time Warner Navigator boxes across the country around November 2009. No one would ever tell me why they removed it, but presumably it was to make customers more readily accept the new guide changes (as implemented in Charlotte).

I always thought the favorites behavior was strange. While it made sense to cluster the favorites before “0″ together so adjacent navigation was easy, there was one annoyance with this. When one was viewing the guide and typed in the exact channel number of one of the favorites, the guide would jump to the existence of the channel below 0. If I wanted to see whether the game was on ESPN or some adjacent channel, and only ESPN was a favorite of these, I would type in 289 and would be looking at ESPN along with the major network favorites of mine. It’s been over a year since I used that guide regularly. It DID leave an instance of the favorite in the normal guide, right? (like it didn’t completely move ESPN away from the 288/290 neighborhood??)

[...] week your favorite site broke the story to Raleigh about Time Warner Cable remapping all of its digital channels in Charlotte. Now Time [...]